Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Lymphoid B Cell Malignancy：a Single Center Analysis in the Real World

Background : Recent developments in immunoconjugate usage has changed the landscape of lymphoid B-cell malignancy therapy. Historically, those who relapse from this condition have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. One recent development is the inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin, which has the potential to reduce the overall toxicity of intensive regimens for ALL, as well as to show therapeutic effects in lymphoid B-cell malignancy.

Aims and Methods: The study included B cell-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) (n=23), B/ myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) (n=1) and B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) (n=3) adult patients who received INO in our center from June 2022 to June 2023. Intravenous INO was given 1 or more doses at the dose of 0.6mg/m2, its clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were explored.

Results: In our center, INO was strategically employed in various therapeutic scenarios: induction (n=2), maintenance/consolidation (n=6), minimal residual disease (MRD) clearance (n=5), and the management of relapsed/refractory lymphoid B-cell malignancies (n=14). Of the 27 patients, 14 were subjected to a combination regimen of INO and chemotherapy for recurrent and refractory lymphoid B-cell malignancy. The composition of these patients comprised of 4 individuals who experienced a relapse post-standard chemotherapy, 1 patient with a relapse post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), 4 patients with a relapse post-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), and the remaining 5 patients were categorized as refractory cases. The median number of doses administered was 2 (1-3). Complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was observed in 9 out of 14 patients (64.3%) within a median duration of 30 (16-78)days. Partial response (PR) was noted in 2 of the 14 patients (14.3%), rendering the overall response rate (ORR) to be 78.6%. Negative MRD was observed in 7 out of 14 patients (50.0%). Of the 9 patients who achieved CR/CRi, 4 (44.4%) relapsed again with 2 fatalities. The remaining 2 patients attained negative MRD following a second allo-HSCT or INO retreatment. The two patients who achieved PR proceeded to receive chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) treatment, with one of them subsequently undergoing allo-HSCT after achieving CR. For the three non-responders (NR), one patient unfortunately passed away while the other two patients remained alive and were either participating in clinical trials or undergoing allo-HSCT after CART. For MRD clearance, it was successfully achieved in 4 out of 5 patients (80.0%)treated with INO within a median period of 45 (28-52)days. However, 2 patients reverted to MRD positivity and 1 died. The other four patients underwent allo-HSCT with neither mortality nor recurrence observed. Moreover, two patients (100%) were treated with a VICLP induction regimen combined with INO, with MRD negativity observed post-treatment. Regarding the remaining six patients, three patients were treated with INO as consolidation therapy due to high-risk factors or the intention to undergo auto-HSCT. Another 3 B-ALL patients treated with INO as maintenance therapy after auto-HSCT or after the remission of recurrence after transplantation. One patient unfortunately experienced a second recurrence four months following INO maintenance. The remaining five patients achieved and have since sustained negative MRD status, preceding INO treatment. Fortunately, no treatment-related fatalities or treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were observed. Notably, 19 out of 27 patients (70.4%) experienced Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, while 1 out of 24 patients (4.2%) exhibited Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) was not observed. Furthermore, two patients developed septicemia, one each from Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively.

Conclusions: Given the well tolerance and improvement in response rates, InO may be an important treatment option not only for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoid B-cell malignancy, but also for induction, maintenance and MRD clearance treatment.

Key words: inotuzumab ozogamicin, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CD22